[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100113074442.GA10492@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:44:42 +0800
From: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
To: jens.axboe@...cle.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jmoyer@...hat.com, vgoyal@...hat.com,
guijianfeng@...fujitsu.com, yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com
Subject: [PATCH]cfq-iosched: don't stop async queue with async requests
pending
My SSD speed of direct write is about 80m/s, while I test page writeback,
the speed can only go to 68m/s. Below patch fixes this.
It appears we missused cfq_should_idle in cfq_may_dispatch. cfq_should_idle
means a queue should idle because it's seekless sync queue or it's the last queue,
which is to maintain service tree time slice. So it doesn't mean the
last queue is always a sync queue. If the last queue is asyn queue,
we definitely shouldn't stop dispatch requests because of pending async
requests.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
index 918c7fd..8198079 100644
--- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
@@ -2222,7 +2222,8 @@ static bool cfq_may_dispatch(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq)
/*
* Drain async requests before we start sync IO
*/
- if (cfq_should_idle(cfqd, cfqq) && cfqd->rq_in_driver[BLK_RW_ASYNC])
+ if (cfq_cfqq_sync(cfqq) && cfq_should_idle(cfqd, cfqq)
+ && cfqd->rq_in_driver[BLK_RW_ASYNC])
return false;
/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists