[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100113172143.B3E8.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:22:37 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] [v2] memcg: add anon_scan_ratio to memory.stat file
Changelog
since v1: cancel to remove "recent_xxx" debug statistics as bilbir's
mention
===========================================
anon_scan_ratio feature doesn't only useful for global VM pressure
analysis, but it also useful for memcg memroy pressure analysis.
Then, this patch add anon_scan_ratio field to memory.stat file too.
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 325df12..7348edc 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2950,6 +2950,11 @@ static int mem_control_stat_show(struct cgroup *cont, struct cftype *cft,
{
struct mem_cgroup *mem_cont = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cont);
struct mcs_total_stat mystat;
+ struct zone *zone;
+ unsigned long total_anon = 0;
+ unsigned long total_scan_anon = 0;
+ unsigned long recent_rotated[2] = {0};
+ unsigned long recent_scanned[2] = {0};
int i;
memset(&mystat, 0, sizeof(mystat));
@@ -2978,33 +2983,47 @@ static int mem_control_stat_show(struct cgroup *cont, struct cftype *cft,
cb->fill(cb, memcg_stat_strings[i].total_name, mystat.stat[i]);
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
cb->fill(cb, "inactive_ratio", calc_inactive_ratio(mem_cont, NULL));
- {
- int nid, zid;
+ for_each_populated_zone(zone) {
+ int nid = zone->zone_pgdat->node_id;
+ int zid = zone_idx(zone);
struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
- unsigned long recent_rotated[2] = {0, 0};
- unsigned long recent_scanned[2] = {0, 0};
-
- for_each_online_node(nid)
- for (zid = 0; zid < MAX_NR_ZONES; zid++) {
- mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(mem_cont, nid, zid);
-
- recent_rotated[0] +=
- mz->reclaim_stat.recent_rotated[0];
- recent_rotated[1] +=
- mz->reclaim_stat.recent_rotated[1];
- recent_scanned[0] +=
- mz->reclaim_stat.recent_scanned[0];
- recent_scanned[1] +=
- mz->reclaim_stat.recent_scanned[1];
- }
- cb->fill(cb, "recent_rotated_anon", recent_rotated[0]);
- cb->fill(cb, "recent_rotated_file", recent_rotated[1]);
- cb->fill(cb, "recent_scanned_anon", recent_scanned[0]);
- cb->fill(cb, "recent_scanned_file", recent_scanned[1]);
+ unsigned long anon;
+ unsigned long ratio;
+
+ mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(mem_cont, nid, zid);
+
+ anon = MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON);
+ anon += MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, LRU_ACTIVE_ANON);
+
+ ratio = get_anon_scan_ratio(zone, mem_cont, mem_cont->swappiness);
+
+ /*
+ * We have per-zone anon-scan-ratio. but we don't hope display such
+ * value directly. Instead, we display following fomula.
+ *
+ * sum(anon * ratio/100)
+ * --------------------- * 100
+ * sum(anon)
+ */
+ total_anon += anon;
+ total_scan_anon += anon * ratio;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
+ recent_rotated[0] += mz->reclaim_stat.recent_rotated[0];
+ recent_rotated[1] += mz->reclaim_stat.recent_rotated[1];
+ recent_scanned[0] += mz->reclaim_stat.recent_scanned[0];
+ recent_scanned[1] += mz->reclaim_stat.recent_scanned[1];
+#endif
}
+ cb->fill(cb, "anon_scan_ratio", total_scan_anon / total_anon);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
+ cb->fill(cb, "recent_rotated_anon", recent_rotated[0]);
+ cb->fill(cb, "recent_rotated_file", recent_rotated[1]);
+ cb->fill(cb, "recent_scanned_anon", recent_scanned[0]);
+ cb->fill(cb, "recent_scanned_file", recent_scanned[1]);
#endif
return 0;
--
1.6.5.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists