[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1263389797.4244.223.camel@laptop>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:36:37 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] rbtree: Introduce rb_for_each_entry
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 14:34 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 02:16:09PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 11:01 -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
> > >
> > > Similar to list_for_each_entry, helps reducing boilerplate in many
> > > places and makes rbtrees closer to list.h macros.
> > >
> > > First conversion will be in the tools/perf.
> >
> > I'm still not sure you really want to do this, it might give people the
> > impression its a sane thing to do ;-)
>
>
> At least it matches many patterns in perf :)
Doesn't make it right.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists