[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1vdf57nel.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:36:18 -0800
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86, apic: use 0x20 for the IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR instead of 0x1f
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> writes:
> On 01/11/2010 05:52 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>
>> After having the documentation quoted at me. I am having a distinct
>> memory of one piece of documentation saying:
>> "interrupts within a priority level can be delivered in any order"
>>
>> So I am guessing there is not any ordering of interrupts in the same
>> priority level until they get to the local apic.
>>
>
> There is no ordering of interrupts before they hit the local APIC, since
> the local APIC is what would serialize them...
The io apic serializes them, and sends them over either the 2-wire
bus or the front side bus. How much serialization and prioritization
happens at that point I am not certain, but some certainly happens
before you get to the local apic.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists