linux-kernel - question on atomic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201001132210.12277.oliver@neukum.org>
Date:	Wed, 13 Jan 2010 22:10:12 +0100
From:	Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
To:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: question on atomic_t

Hi,

is the behavior of atomic_t on overflow defined on all architectures?

	Regards
		Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/