linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] Yet another dt3155 driver for drivers/staging

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100113001724.GB29904@kroah.com>
Date:	Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:17:24 -0800
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Scott Smedley <ss@....gov.au>
Cc:	Marin Mitov <mitov@...p.bas.bg>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Yet another dt3155 driver for drivers/staging

On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 10:52:21AM +1100, Scott Smedley wrote:
> Hi Marin,
> 
> > dt3155 frame grabber I am using in my experiments since 
> > the time of 2.6.17 kernel.
> 
> Whoah!
> 
> > I will really appreciate your comments, suggestions, criticism.
> 
> I haven't tried your driver but the code looks much neater than
> our driver. Still, I am wondering why you chose to implement a
> device driver from scratch, rather than use an existing one?
> 
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/dt3155a/
> 
> I'll leave decisions about whether to merge or discard (either
> driver) to Greg. My 2 cents is that there should only be 1 DT3155
> driver for users to choose from.

I agree, we only need one of them.

Scott, any comparison between the two of them as to which one actually
works better?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/