[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1001132305280.6420@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:08:49 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@...hat.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Magnus Damm <damm@...l.co.jp>,
H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clockevent: don't remove broadcast device when cpu is
dead
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010, Xiaotian Feng wrote:
> On 01/12/2010 09:20 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Thu, 7 Jan 2010, Xiaotian Feng wrote:
> >
> > > Marc reported BUG during shutdown, after debugging, kernel is trying
> > > to remove a broadcast device which mode is CLOCK_EVT_MODE_ONESHOT.
> > >
> > > The root cause for this bug is that in clockevents_notify,
> > > "cpumask_weight(dev->cpumask) == 1" is always true even if dev is a
> >
> > Why is cpumask_weight(dev->cpumask) == 1 always true when we shutdown
> > a non boot cpu ?
> >
> > The broadcast device is not a per cpu device and the cpumask should
> > not only contain the CPU which is shut down !
>
> At least for hpet broadcast dev, it's dev->cpumask is only contain the CPU
> which it is initialized from.
Which is fundamentaly wrong and the root cause of the problem. I'll
have a look tomorrow morning when my brain is more awake than now.
> And for broadcast device, kernel is using tick_broadcast_mask not
> dev->cpumask, right?
No, tick_broadcast_mask is the bitmask which tells us which cpus get
the broadcast IPI.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists