[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B4E48BB.5030902@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:27:07 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"ananth@...ibm.com" <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 5/5] x86: use dmi check to treat disabled cpus as
hotplug cpus.
On 01/13/2010 02:23 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> There are configurations in which percpu memory is in the megabytes.
>
> There used to be some like this (with some broken debug code), but they
> got all fixed i believe to only allocate on real cpu hotplug.
>
> If not the right way is to fix them, not add DMI blacklists.
>
> Beside when you enable debug code you probably don't care about
> a few MB too much.
>
>> This is exactly why we need high water mark allocation of percpu memory:
>
> No we just need to fix any percpu pigs (if there are really any left,
> I did a couple of patches some time ago)
>
> "Don't work around broken code -- fix it"
>
Well, that *is* working around broken code, in this case the broken code
is the percpu allocation strategy.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists