linux-kernel - Re: Changelog quality

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1001140704410.18724@ask.diku.dk>
Date:	Thu, 14 Jan 2010 07:05:32 +0100 (CET)
From:	Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
To:	Németh Márton <nm127@...email.hu>
Cc:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@....com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, cocci@...u.dk
Subject: Re: Changelog quality

On Thu, 14 Jan 2010, Németh Márton wrote:

> Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 01:04:52PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> >> On Wed, 13 Jan 2010, Greg KH wrote:
> >>
> >>>> It would be nice if there was a way to link automatically a git commit
> >>>> to an archived copy of the email message in which it was originally 
> >>>> submitted.
> >>> Ingo has been doing this on some patches by putting a message-id field
> >>> in the signed-off-by area showing what lkml message a patch came from.
> >>>
> >>> See git commit id 6432e734c99ed685e3cad72f7dcae4c65008fcab in Linus's
> >>> tree as an example of this.
> >>>
> >>> I have no objection if people want to do this for any patches going
> >>> through my tree as well.
> >> If it has to be included manually by the patch submitter then it isn't
> >> automatic.  Not to mention that the submitter would need to know the
> >> email's message-id before the email message was sent!
> >>
> >> Something like this should belong in a maintainer's script.
> > 
> > Yeah, that would get messy, as usually a patch happens in a different
> > thread than the original problem occurs, so it would take a lot more
> > work on my part to try to match things up.  If I notice it, I will try
> > to in the future.
> 
> What about introducing a new tag like 'SmPL-Used:'? The used SmPL could
> be placed somewhere in the web. This would require only one line in
> the changelog: e.g.:
> 
> SmPL-Used: http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/sp.php#usb_submit_urb

There is no guarantee that this URL will be valid 5 or 10 years from now.

julia