[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100114161311.673B.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:14:10 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Huang Shijie <shijie8@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [resend][PATCH] mm: Restore zone->all_unreclaimable to independence word
> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>
> > commit e815af95 (change all_unreclaimable zone member to flags) chage
> > all_unreclaimable member to bit flag. but It have undesireble side
> > effect.
> > free_one_page() is one of most hot path in linux kernel and increasing
> > atomic ops in it can reduce kernel performance a bit.
> >
> > Thus, this patch revert such commit partially. at least
> > all_unreclaimable shouldn't share memory word with other zone flags.
> >
>
> I still think you need to quantify this; saying you don't have a large
> enough of a machine that will benefit from it isn't really a rationale for
> the lack of any data supporting your claim. We should be basing VM
> changes on data, not on speculation that there's a measurable impact
> here.
>
> Perhaps you could ask a colleague or another hacker to run a benchmark for
> you so that the changelog is complete?
ok, fair. although I dislike current unnecessary atomic-ops.
I'll pending this patch until get good data.
thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists