lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100114010335.GB20569@aao.gov.au>
Date:	Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:03:36 +1100
From:	Scott Smedley <ss@....gov.au>
To:	Marin Mitov <mitov@...p.bas.bg>
Cc:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Yet another dt3155 driver for drivers/staging

Hi Greg & Marin,

> > Scott, any comparison between the two of them as to which one actually
> > works better?

I'd be interested in Marin's opinion as he appears to have used both
drivers extensively.

I'd like a userspace program to actually try out Marin's driver, but
I can still make some general comments:

Things I like about Marin's driver:
- It is only ~1/3rd the size. (by counting new lines)
- The code is much neater.
- It can acquire frames at 25 fps (real-time), according to Marin.
- At least 1 person with intimate knowledge of the code seems keen to
  maintain it.

Things I like about the sourceforge (SF) driver:
- It works in CCIR mode (768x576) or 640x480 mode.
- It is well tested.
- It works with most kernel versions. ie. 2.2, 2.4, & 2.6. (mostly)
- It works with multiple boards.
- The code is moderately well commented.
- It includes simple (user space) example programs.


Clearly each driver has strengths over the other.

It would probably be easier to upgrade Marin's driver to match the
strengths of the SF driver than the other way around. The only
difficulty might be in making Marin's driver work with older kernel
versions. IMO, that's probably an acceptable sacrifice to make. (For
users of legacy systems, we could point them to the (unmaintained)
driver on SF.)

> if you have 2 or more boards, could you check if
> my driver is working with more than one board?

Sorry, I only have 1 board available to test with.

Marin, if you are considering upgrading your driver, I propose
we send an email to the DT3155 SF mailing list & ask for help
testing. (I already know of 1 other person who is happy to help
test.) I recommend making userspace programs (like examples/acquire
& examples/Xview in the SF driver) available first. Ideally, these
example programs & user space libraries would become the major
component of the evolved DT3155 SF project.

What do you think?

Scott. :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ