[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1263467289.4244.288.camel@laptop>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:08:09 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
utrace-devel <utrace-devel@...hat.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
Maneesh Soni <maneesh@...ibm.com>,
Mark Wielaard <mjw@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/7] User Space Breakpoint Assistance Layer (UBP)
On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 17:55 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> User Space Breakpoint Assistance Layer (UBP)
>
> User space breakpointing Infrastructure provides kernel subsystems
> with architecture independent interface to establish breakpoints in
> user applications. This patch provides core implementation of ubp and
> also wrappers for architecture dependent methods.
So if this is the basic infrastructure to set userspace breakpoints,
then why not call this uprobe?
> UBP currently supports both single stepping inline and execution out
> of line strategies. Two different probepoints in the same process can
> have two different strategies.
maybe explain wth these are?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists