[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1263467394.4244.291.camel@laptop>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:09:54 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
utrace-devel <utrace-devel@...hat.com>,
Mark Wielaard <mjw@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
Maneesh Soni <maneesh@...ibm.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 4/7] Uprobes Implementation
On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 17:55 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
>
> Uprobes Infrastructure enables user to dynamically establish
> probepoints in user applications and collect information by executing
> a handler functions when the probepoints are hit.
> Please refer Documentation/uprobes.txt for more details.
>
> This patch provides the core implementation of uprobes.
> This patch builds on utrace infrastructure.
>
> You need to follow this up with the uprobes patch for your
> architecture.
So all this is basically some glue between what you call ubp (the real
userspace breakpoint stuff) and utrace? Or does it do more?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists