linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] perf: Various event scheduling improvements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100114130943.GE5033@nowhere>
Date:	Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:09:45 +0100
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] perf: Various event scheduling improvements

On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 01:49:14PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 02:38 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > These patches bring (I hope) a bit more scalability and fairness
> > to the perf events scheduling.
> > 
> > But this is only an introduction as there is still some work to
> > do, like ensuring all pinned events have been scheduled before
> > flexible ones (for now we schedule in order cpu pinned, cpu flexible,
> > task pinned, task flexible), among other improvements.
> 
> Right, so 1-5 look fine (although I'd have folded 5 into 3), thanks!


Ok, I'll merge 5 into 3 and send it as a pull request to Ingo
with your ack.

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/