[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100114132451.GA2546@localhost>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 21:24:51 +0800
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "Zheng, Shaohui" <shaohui.zheng@...el.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"y-goto@...fujitsu.com" <y-goto@...fujitsu.com>,
Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [ RESEND PATCH v3] Memory-Hotplug: Fix the bug on interface
/dev/mem for 64-bit kernel
Kame,
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 05:04:33PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> 3 points...
> 1. I think this patch cannot be compiled in archs other than x86. Right ?
> IOW, please add static inline dummy...
Good catch!
> 2. pgdat->[start,end], totalram_pages etc...are updated at memory hotplug.
> Please place the hook nearby them.
arch/x86/mm/init_64.c:arch_add_memory() updates max_pfn_mapped, in
this sense it's equally OK to update max_pfn/max_low_pfn etc before
the call to arch_add_memory() ;)
> 3. I recommend you yo use memory hotplug notifier.
> If it's allowed, it will be cleaner.
Hmm, notifier is for _outsider_ subsystems. It smells a bit
overkill to do notifier _inside_ the hotplug code.
> It seems there are no strict ordering to update parameters this patch touches.
I tend to agree. That said, it does help keep our mind straight if we do it
in some logical order: max_pfn => max_pfn_mapped => totalram_pages etc.
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists