[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B4F3A1A.2030906@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 07:36:58 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: rostedt@...dmis.org
CC: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...e.hu, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, tglx@...utronix.de,
andi@...stfloor.org, roland@...hat.com, rth@...hat.com,
mhiramat@...hat.com, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/8] jump label v4 - x86: Introduce generic jump patching
without stop_machine
On 01/14/2010 07:32 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> +
>> + /* Replacing 1 byte can be done atomically. */
>> + if (unlikely(len <= 1))
>> + return text_poke(addr, opcode, len);
>
> This part bothers me. The text_poke just writes over the text directly
> (using a separate mapping). But if that memory is in the pipeline of
> another CPU, I think this could cause a GPF.
>
Could you clarify why you think that?
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists