| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:04:56 +0100 From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/24] MAINTAINERS: Document new "Q:" patchwork queue type Joe Perches wrote: > On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 15:02 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote: >> Stefan Richter wrote: >>> The proposed entry type is somewhat redundant: >> PS: Make sure that patchwork.kernel.org and patchwork.ozlabs.org are >> mentioned in our process-related documentation, and you are done. No >> need for more MAINTAINERS churn just for that. > > Many lists are not using patchwork. All lists which do use patchwork are listed on patchwork.kernel.org and patchwork.ozlabs.org. So, add a paragraph on them in Documentation/HOWTO and you are done. The listings at patchwork.kernel.org and patchwork.ozlabs.org are always current. Your manual copy in the kernel source won't be. See? I just saved you and others quite some time. You could spend it for example to helpgetting our regressions count down. > Micropatches to MAINTAINERS are preferred because of rate of change. Useless micropatches do _not_ make one look productive. -- Stefan Richter -=====-==-=- ---= -===- http://arcgraph.de/sr/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists