[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B4F5CC8.7020107@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:04:56 +0100
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/24] MAINTAINERS: Document new "Q:" patchwork queue
type
Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 15:02 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
>> Stefan Richter wrote:
>>> The proposed entry type is somewhat redundant:
>> PS: Make sure that patchwork.kernel.org and patchwork.ozlabs.org are
>> mentioned in our process-related documentation, and you are done. No
>> need for more MAINTAINERS churn just for that.
>
> Many lists are not using patchwork.
All lists which do use patchwork are listed on patchwork.kernel.org and
patchwork.ozlabs.org. So, add a paragraph on them in
Documentation/HOWTO and you are done.
The listings at patchwork.kernel.org and patchwork.ozlabs.org are always
current. Your manual copy in the kernel source won't be.
See? I just saved you and others quite some time. You could spend it
for example to helpgetting our regressions count down.
> Micropatches to MAINTAINERS are preferred because of rate of change.
Useless micropatches do _not_ make one look productive.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==-=- ---= -===-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists