linux-kernel - Re: SATA_SIL on IXP425 workaround

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m3y6k0h848.fsf@intrepid.localdomain>
Date:	Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:08:39 +0100
From:	Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
To:	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: SATA_SIL on IXP425 workaround

Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com> writes:

> FWIW your patch is now in my atang tree (I'm aware that Jeff is working
> on generic solution but in the meantime this non-intrusive patch allows
> sata_sil to work on IXP425).

Thanks. BTW I could help with the "general solution", but I wonder if
what we need is simply adding those other ARM archs to IXP4xx (through
Kconfig)? If they have the same problem, namely inability to do
readb/readw only, while being able to write[bwl] and all kinds of non-MM
I/O.

writeb() is important since it starts the "large PRD" transfers (it has
to use MMIO BAR to be "large").
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/