[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B4F6D5F.10008@cs.helsinki.fi>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 21:15:43 +0200
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
airlied@...ux.ie
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.33-rc4
Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:50:52 +0200
> Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi> wrote:
>
>> Jesse Barnes wrote:
>>> On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:03:00 +0200
>>> Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:44 AM, Linus Torvalds
>>>> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>>>> Hmm. Odd release. Something like 40% of the patches are in DRM
>>>>> (mostly nouveau and radeon, both staging, so it's a bit less scary
>>>>> than it sounds. But there's a noticeable i915 component too).
>>>>> That's all pretty unusual, afaik.
>>>> 2.6.33-rc4 still suffers from an annoying screen flicker with i915
>>>> and KMS on my machine. I *think* it started with 2.6.33-rc1 but I
>>>> haven't had the time to dig deeper.
>>> Does this patch fix it? If so I'll queue something like this up for
>>> -rc5.
>> Yes, it does. Thanks!
>
> Great, thanks for testing. I'll send Eric a patch to disable this
> feature more properly.
OK, I think I am seeing a different kind of flicker now. It doesn't
happen anywhere as often as before (which is probably why I missed it
last night). The flicker is more like a flash of some other window
whereas the flicker before used to "shake" the screen.
Does this ring a bell?
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists