[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1001141302360.13231@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:05:17 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Peter Clifton <pcjc2@....ac.uk>
cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Nick Bowler <nbowler@...iptictech.com>, airlied@...ux.ie,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: disable LVDS downclock by
default
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010, Peter Clifton wrote:
>
> Would it not be a better idea to turn this feature on by default, then
> use quirks to disable it on the afflicted borken machines?
No.
"Working" is good. "Broken" is bad.
We don't default to clearly unsafe models.
Maybe a few years from now, when people have learnt to do power management
correctly and BIOSes fill in the fields right, we can reconsider. But
right now, it's _way_ more important that things work reliably.
That said, I think a module parameter is the wrong thing. If this can be
done dynamically with a sysfs value, do it that way instead (yes, I
realize that module parameters end up being also visible in /sys, but I
think Jesse's patch doesn't allow a person to set the value - and make it
change the behavior - _while_ the display is all up and running).
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists