[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100114135138.39895280@jbarnes-piketon>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:51:38 -0800
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc: Nick Bowler <nbowler@...iptictech.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
airlied@...ux.ie, eric@...olt.net, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: disable LVDS downclock by default
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:25:57 +0200
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi> wrote:
> Hi Jesse,
>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Jesse Barnes
> <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org> wrote:
> > Many platform support this feature, and it can provide significant
> > power savings when the reduced refresh rate is low. However, on
> > some platforms a secondary (reduced) timing is provided but not
> > actually supported by the hardware. This results in undesirable
> > flicker at runtime.
> >
> > So disable the feature by default, but allow users to opt-in to the
> > reduced clock behavior with a new module parameter, lvds_downclock,
> > that can be set to 1 to enable the feature.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
> >
> > --
> >
> > Nick and Pekka, please try this out and reply with your Tested-by
> > (assuming it works, if not I'll fix it up).
>
> This gives me pretty much identical results as your original patch.
> That is, the "shakes" are gone but I still see the occasional "flash".
> Should I give Nick's patch a try to see if we're looking at the same
> issue or wait for your new patch?
Nick's patch should be the same, thanks for testing.
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists