[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B5023A6.5070100@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 09:13:26 +0100
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To: Andy Isaacson <adi@...apodia.org>
CC: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>, N??meth M??rton <nm127@...email.hu>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@....com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, cocci@...u.dk
Subject: Re: Changelog quality (was Re: [PATCH] uwb: make USB device id constant)
Andy Isaacson wrote:
> For example, look at 5d66fe92. The semantic patch is blissfully,
> incredibly clear. It makes the sun shine down through the clouds, the
> birds sing, and the kzalloc align. It's 10 lines long and is quite
> intuitive and explanatory. In that case, I think it's clear that the
> spatch is worth the changelog space it takes up, even though the
> changelog is larger than the diff by quite a margin.
5d66fe92 is another example of what I was talking about. The changelog
could have read:
drivers/net : Correct the size argument to kzalloc
lp->rx_skb is for an array of pointers, not of structs.
Found using coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: ...
Tell me again in what way the script is of any importance or of any help
in the permanent SCM changelog after commit.
I agree with you that it is very good to have the script in the patch
posting, but I disagree about the changelog.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==-=- ---= -====
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists