linux-kernel - Re: Changelog quality

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <84144f021001150452h22563ffaw14f74cc449950982@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:52:33 +0200
From:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Cc:	Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, adi@...apodia.org,
	nm127@...email.hu, david.vrabel@....com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cocci@...u.dk,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Nicolas Palix <npalix@...u.dk>
Subject: Re: Changelog quality

Hi Stefan,

On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Stefan Richter
<stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> wrote:
> I guess many of these scripts are also applicable to other C programs.

Well, most of the ones I've seen are related to kernel APIs or idioms
which are not meaningful to other projects so I don't know if that's
true or not. I don't have a full solution here but I'm just trying to
find a middle ground because I tend to agree with both of you. Yes,
it's damn ugly to have the scripts embedded in the changelog but on
the other hand I _really_ want to see "what the hell found the bug"
too.

                        Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/