[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1263564403.4244.430.camel@laptop>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:06:43 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>
Cc: Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ibm.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Wielaard <mjw@...hat.com>,
utrace-devel <utrace-devel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 4/7] Uprobes Implementation
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 09:00 -0500, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> Well, I'm not in a position to argue line by line about the necessity
> or the cost of utrace low level guts, but this may represent the most
> practical engineering balance between functionality / modularity /
> undesirably intrusive modifications.
How intrusive and non-modular is installing a DIE_INT3 notifier?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists