[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <x494omnp2xd.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:45:50 -0500
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To: Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@...il.com>
Cc: "Zhang\, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"jens.axboe\@oracle.com" <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
"Zhang\, Yanmin" <yanmin.zhang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]cfq-iosched: don't take requests with long distence as close
Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@...il.com> writes:
> Hi Jeff,
> I think this patch has the same flaw as Shaohua's.
> The seekiness check that you introduce in cfq_rq_close is already
> present in its caller, cfq_close_cooperator, so it is not effective.
I don't think so. There are two queues, here. One queue is checked by
the caller, and that is the cur_cfqq. The __cfqq needs to also be
checked.
> Up to now, the only patch that improves this situation is the one that
> changes the unmerge policy to unmerge after a single time slice.
Yes, I definitely agree with that, and I think that patch should go in.
Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists