| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4B4FFF51.6020803@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 06:38:25 +0100 From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> To: James Kosin <JKosin@...comgrp.com> CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: at91_ether.c - Allow transmitter interrupt to be handled first in ISR Le 14/01/2010 21:28, James Kosin a écrit : > Thanks David, > > I'm checking out the latest git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-2.6.git > With git now... > > A few items: > a) Is it OK to use git-diff to build a patch file? Or does everyone still prefer > diff? If you cook your patches using a git tree, git diff is very fine to send official patches. > > b) I'm going to try and test also; since, I do have an active platform I > can test on. Are there any other developers using the ARM that may be able > to provide some feedback? Eric Dumazet had some interesting comments > but, none of the original people in the file are around anymore I'm afraid. > That or they really don't want to be contacted. If you can test patches, and other dev can review them, they can find their way in kernel, dont worry :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists