linux-kernel - Re: Ubuntu 32-bit, 32-bit PAE, 64-bit Kernel Benchmarks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <SNT125-DS19339D7DE9CFA33C1D54AC3680@phx.gbl>
Date:	Fri, 15 Jan 2010 22:17:41 -0800
From:	<yuhongbao_386@...mail.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	<mingo@...hat.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com>
Subject: Re: Ubuntu 32-bit, 32-bit PAE, 64-bit Kernel Benchmarks

> Since 32 bits means that any machine with 1 GB more means HIGHMEM, the
> number of non-embedded machines that should run 32-bit kernels today is
> functionally the null set.
You mean machines made today?
> Unfortunately Linux distros have not
> properly promoted 64-bit kernels for 32-bit distros; although pure 64
> bits is better, it would be a *helluva* lot better if people stuck on 32
> bits for compatibility reasons had a saner alternative.
Yep, I remember having to use --force-architecture to install the Linux 
kernel from the 64-bit version of Ubuntu into the 32-bit version.
As I remember, the package name was the same as the 32-bit version, causing 
confusion.
What led me to uninstall it, though, was that suspend/resume did not work 
properly.
I am adding a CC to the Ubuntu kernel team mailing list.

Yuhong Bao 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/