lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100116120410.GB20984@comet.dominikbrodowski.net>
Date:	Sat, 16 Jan 2010 13:04:10 +0100
From:	Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
To:	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-pcmcia@...ts.infradead.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: broken pcmcia_bus_match for dynids

Hey,

On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 01:42:05PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> stanse found that when PCMCIA_DEV_ID_MATCH_FAKE_CIS is set in
> match_flags for a dynid, the pcmcia layer may deadlock.
> 
> pcmcia_load_firmware in such case calls non-atomic operations
> (request_firmware, kzalloc(GFP_KERNEL)), while dynids.lock spinlock is held.
> 
> Any ideas how to solve this? Any idea, why p_drv->dynids.lock is not a
> mutex instead?

Well, as dynid->id.cisfile is never set, it is still NULL, which means
pcmcia_load_firmware is left immediately, without calling the (blocking)
request_firmare(). So this actually isn't a problem, AFAICS.

Nonetheless, I'll prepare a patch to replace it with a mutex for 2.6.34.

Best,
	Dominik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ