[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B51DCBF.9090902@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 16:35:27 +0100
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To: Thiago Farina <tfransosi@...il.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Willem Riede <osst@...de.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
osst-users@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi/osst.c: remove unncessary casting of kmalloc.
Thiago Farina wrote:
> --- a/drivers/scsi/osst.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/osst.c
> @@ -5842,9 +5842,8 @@ static int osst_probe(struct device *dev)
> /* if this is the first attach, build the infrastructure */
> write_lock(&os_scsi_tapes_lock);
> if (os_scsi_tapes == NULL) {
> - os_scsi_tapes =
> - (struct osst_tape **)kmalloc(osst_max_dev * sizeof(struct osst_tape *),
> - GFP_ATOMIC);
> + os_scsi_tapes = kmalloc(osst_max_dev * sizeof(struct osst_tape *),
> + GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (os_scsi_tapes == NULL) {
> write_unlock(&os_scsi_tapes_lock);
> printk(KERN_ERR "osst :E: Unable to allocate array for OnStream SCSI tapes.\n");
Since you update the style of this kmalloc usage, you could at the same
time change the sizeof expression to sizeof(* os_scsi_tapes).
There is a lot more that could be renovated around os_scsi_tapes, and
osst in general (GFP_ATOMIC allocations in a device probe? Fixed
maximum number of devices? BKL usage?), but whether it'd be worth the
effort I don't know.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==-=- ---= =----
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists