[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201001161123.15502.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 11:23:15 -0800
From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
Cc: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Linux Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-embedded" <linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: flash_platform_data namespace collision
On Saturday 16 January 2010, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-01-16 at 11:04 +0000, Russell King wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 11:41:15PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > > I've got a board here with SPI, NOR, and NAND flash devices and I've
> > > just run into a namespace collision on flash_platform_data from
> >
> > The one in arch/arm/include/asm/mach/flash.h is designed to have great
> > appeal and flexibility across different platforms, and indeed we have
> > at least 70 users across six different MTD NOR flash drivers and two
> > MTD NAND drivers.
Yet it doesn't do what's needed for SPI flash (identify the chip type,
when it can't probed); and for that application none of those methods
are useful (and their slots are just wasted/confusing space).
> > If anything, I believe that this header should move into linux/mtd/
> > and become a standard structure for platforms to communicate their
> > requirements to flash drivers.
>
> Yeah, I think this is probably the way to go. Davids, any objections?
I had similar thoughts when I first happened across that structure.
But such a move wouldn't resolve $SUBJECT ... which is IMO best addressed
by the obvious rename of the one to spi_flash_platform_data.
- dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists