[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1001161233300.13231@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Sat, 16 Jan 2010 12:34:42 -0800 (PST)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86 fixes
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> Cyrill Gorcunov (1):
>       x86: kernel_thread() -- initialize SS to a known state
This looks bogus. Why does it do it only on x86-64?
Either people care about SS or they don't (the answer, I suspect, is "they 
don't"). But if they care, we should do it on both 32-bit _and_ 64-bit, 
no?
		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
