[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1001161233300.13231@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 12:34:42 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86 fixes
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> Cyrill Gorcunov (1):
> x86: kernel_thread() -- initialize SS to a known state
This looks bogus. Why does it do it only on x86-64?
Either people care about SS or they don't (the answer, I suspect, is "they
don't"). But if they care, we should do it on both 32-bit _and_ 64-bit,
no?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists