[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100117182906.GR19799@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 18:29:06 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, teigland@...hat.com,
Matt_Domsch@...l.com, maciej.sosnowski@...el.com,
hjk@...utronix.de, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
jens.axboe@...cle.com, shemminger@...tta.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, davem@...emloft.net,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Constify struct sysfs_ops for v2.6.33-rc4
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 06:25:37PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 05:20:38PM +0100, Emese Revfy wrote:
>
> > Signed-off-by: Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>
> > Acked-by: David Teigland <teigland@...hat.com>
> > Acked-by: Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@...l.com>
> > Acked-by: Maciej Sosnowski <maciej.sosnowski@...el.com>
> > Acked-by: Hans J. Koch <hjk@...utronix.de>
> > Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
> > Acked-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
> > Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
>
> NACKed-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
>
> Same reason.
BTW, commit 9905a43b2d563e6f89e4c63c4278ada03f2ebb14
Author: Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>
Date: Mon Dec 14 00:58:57 2009 +0100
backlight: Constify struct backlight_ops
is also crap; again, same reason. Would you please get a clue and stop
pushing that particular bullshit into the tree?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists