[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100117141233.GF5035@nowhere>
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 15:12:35 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, paulus@...ba.org,
davem@...emloft.net, perfmon2-devel@...ts.sf.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf_events: improve x86 event scheduling
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 06:22:54PM +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Ok,
>
> Something like that should problably do it:
>
> static void event_sched_out(struct perf_event *event, int cpu)
> {
> event->state = PERF_EVENT_STATE_INACTIVE;
> event->oncpu = -1;
> }
You need to also call pmu->disable() if it is a software event,
because a breakpoint needs to be unregistered in hardware level
too.
And disable it in x86 level if it is an x86 event?
> hw_perf_group_sched_in()
> {
> ....
> n = 1;
> list_for_each_entry(sub, &leader->sibling_list, group_entry) {
> if (sub->state > PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF) {
> ret = event_sched_in(sub, cpu);
> if (ret)
> goto undo;
Yeah we indeed really need to check that.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists