linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 04/12] Add "handle page fault" PV helper.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100117144411.GI31692@redhat.com>
Date:	Sun, 17 Jan 2010 16:44:11 +0200
From:	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, avi@...hat.com, mingo@...e.hu,
	tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com, riel@...hat.com,
	cl@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/12] Add "handle page fault" PV helper.

On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 06:31:07PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 16:12 +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > Allow paravirtualized guest to do special handling for some page faults.
> > 
> > The patch adds one 'if' to do_page_fault() function. The call is patched
> > out when running on physical HW. I ran kernbech on the kernel with and
> > without that additional 'if' and result were rawly the same:
> 
> So why not program a different handler address for the #PF/#GP faults
> and avoid the if all together?
I would gladly use fault vector reserved by x86 architecture, but I am
not sure Intel will be happy about it.

--
			Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/