[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100117154343.GA27123@infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 10:43:43 -0500
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, avi@...hat.com, mingo@...e.hu,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
riel@...hat.com, cl@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/12] Add get_user_pages() variant that fails if
major fault is required.
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 04:12:48PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> This patch add get_user_pages() variant that only succeeds if getting
> a reference to a page doesn't require major fault.
>
> +int get_user_pages_noio(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
> + unsigned long start, int nr_pages, int write, int force,
> + struct page **pages, struct vm_area_struct **vmas)
> +{
> + int flags = FOLL_TOUCH | FOLL_MINOR;
> +
> + if (pages)
> + flags |= FOLL_GET;
> + if (write)
> + flags |= FOLL_WRITE;
> + if (force)
> + flags |= FOLL_FORCE;
> +
> + return __get_user_pages(tsk, mm, start, nr_pages, flags, pages, vmas);
Wouldn't it be better to just export __get_user_pages as a proper user
interface, maybe replacing get_user_pages by it entirely?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists