linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: vfs tree build warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100118060118.GT19799@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 18 Jan 2010 06:01:18 +0000
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Sage Weil <sage@...dream.net>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: vfs tree build warning

On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 04:41:48PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Sage,
> 
> On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 20:34:29 -0800 (PST) Sage Weil <sage@...dream.net> wrote:
> >
> > I can put this in the for-next branch of the ceph tree.
> 
> Not unless you first merge the vfs tree into the ceph tree ...

Grr...  How about putting these two commits on a separate (and absolutely
unchanging) branch?  I'd rather live without being unable to rediff
for-next if needed and that way nfs, ceph, etc. could pull _that_ instead.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/