[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100118075025.GA22476@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 08:50:25 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
> scripts/recordmcount.pl between commit
> b82a4045f7962483a78a874343dc6e31b79c96c1 ("tracing/x86: Derive arch from
> bits argument in recordmcount.pl") from Linus' tree and commit
> dfaa9e2c5707b2c217c0121aac796e0fa3051482 ("tracing: Use appropriate perl
> constructs in recordmcount.pl") from the tip tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix for a while.
FYI, i resolved the conflict already in tip:master yesterday, a bit
differently.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists