[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ljfv4u3z.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 10:53:20 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, avi@...hat.com,
mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com, riel@...hat.com,
cl@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/12] Add "handle page fault" PV helper.
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> writes:
>
> Whatever are we doing to end up in do_page_fault() as it stands? Surely
> we can tell the CPU to go elsewhere to handle faults?
>
> Isn't that as simple as calling set_intr_gate(14, my_page_fault)
> somewhere on the cpuinit instead of the regular page_fault handler?
That typically requires ugly ifdefs in entry*S and could be described
as code obfuscation ("come from")
As long as he avoids a global reference (patch) the if should be practially
free anyways.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists