[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1263809620.4283.173.camel@laptop>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 11:13:40 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu, awalls@...ix.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jeff@...zik.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, cl@...ux-foundation.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com, avi@...hat.com,
johannes@...solutions.net, andi@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/40] sched: consult online mask instead of active in
select_fallback_rq()
On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 09:57 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> If called after sched_class chooses a CPU which isn't in a task's
> cpus_allowed mask,
I can only see this happening when you're changing cpus_allowed after
starting to take down the cpu. IOW you're moving a thread to a dying
cpu.
This is because you're spawning workqueue threads while we're going
down?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists