[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7c86c4471001180546v74ac3b16ia8c7cadf2a030204@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:46:21 +0100
From: stephane eranian <eranian@...glemail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
perfmon2-devel@...ts.sf.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>, paulus@...ba.org,
mingo@...e.hu, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [perfmon2] [PATCH] perf: fix the is_software_event() definition
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 13:07 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
>> Agreed.
>>
>> But then Stephane will need to update his patch and use
>> something else than is_software_event() to guess if an event
>> needs its pmu->enable/disable to be called.
>
> Yes, that's what I told him before and even send a patch for, the name I
> chose was is_x86_event().
>
Yes, I remember that. I will modify the patch to use a function like that.
I think the PPC code would need to be updated similarly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists