[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100118171148.GB22111@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 19:11:48 +0200
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
andrew.c.morrow@...il.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] add MAP_UNLOCKED mmap flag
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 04:14:43PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 17:11 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 01/18/2010 05:06 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 17:01 +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > >
> > >> There are valid uses for mlockall()
> > >>
> > > That's debatable.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Real-time?
>
> I would not advice that, just mlock() the text and data you need for the
> real-time thread. mlockall() is a really blunt instrument.
>
Yes it is blunt, but the patch makes it less so.
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists