[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100118190445.GA16989@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 20:04:46 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Alberto Panizzo <maramaopercheseimorto@...il.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
Sascha linux-arm <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel-infradead <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: mc13783: consider Power Gates as digital
regulators.
Hello Alberto,
Can you post an updated patch addressing the discussion with Mark,
please?
>From the first look I don't like the name
MC13783_REG_POWERMISC_PWGTSPI_M as I don't understand it's purpose
without going through mc13783_reg_rmw_powermisc (which I didn't do yet).
What is the base for your patch? (Hm, it seems next could work.
mc13783-regulator seems to have gotten some more #defines ending in _M.
You seem to mean "mask". IMHO it's a bit unfortunate, because the
nameing scheme doesn't match the already existing names :-()
Shouldn't mc13783_state_powermisc_pwgt be a per-device variable instead
of a static variable?
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists