[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100118104913.66c8d90c.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 10:49:13 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] vfs: introduce FMODE_NEG_OFFSET for allowing
negative f_pos
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 10:32:49 +0900
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp> wrote:
> OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp> writes:
>
> >>> Um... How do lseek() work? It sounds like to violate error code range.
> >>
> >> This is for read-write. As far as I know,
> >> - generic_file_llseek,
> >> - default_llseek
> >> - no_llseek
> >>
> >> doesn't call this function.
> >
> > It seems to allow to set negative value to ->f_pos, right? So, lseek()
> > returns (uses) it?
>
> BTW, another concern by negative "pos" value is, the following like code
>
> pos >> shift_bits
>
> it will break the above. So, I think it should be checked if not yet.
Where do we check ?
FMODE_NEG_OFFSET is just used by /dev/mem and /proc/<pid>/mem. And I don't
think there are no additonal users. So, I myself don't have has such concerns...
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists