[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100118110019.c55ad88a.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 11:00:19 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] vfs: introduce FMODE_NEG_OFFSET for allowing
negative f_pos
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 10:38:27 +0900
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp> wrote:
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> writes:
>
> >> So, lseek() returns (uses) it?
> >
> > lseek can return negative value, as far as I know.
>
> Umm..., how do you know the difference of -EOVERFLOW and fpos == -75?
>
Ah, sorry. I read wrong.
For /dev/mem, it uses its own lseek function which allows negative f_pos
value. Other usual file system doesn't allow negative f_pos.
It's ok not to return -EOVEFLOW for /dev/mem because there is no file end.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists