[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100118112359.AE3C.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 11:24:51 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3][v2] vmstat: add anon_scan_ratio field to zoneinfo
> On 01/17/2010 09:10 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
>
> > Absoultely right. I missed that. Thanks.
> > get_scan_ratio used lru_lock to get reclaim_stat->recent_xxxx.
> > But, it doesn't used lru_lock to get ap/fp.
> >
> > Is it intentional? I think you or Rik know it. :)
> > I think if we want to get exact value, we have to use lru_lock until
> > getting ap/fp.
> > If it isn't, we don't need lru_lock when we get the reclaim_stat->recent_xxxx.
> >
> > What do you think about it?
>
> This is definately not intentional.
Really?
So, I'll post next patch.
Thanks.
> Getting race conditions in this code could throw off the
> statistics by a factor 2. I do not know how serious that
> would be for the VM or whether (and how quickly) it would
> self correct.
>
> --
> All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists