[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1263899550.6669.21.camel@realization>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:12:30 +0100
From: Alberto Panizzo <maramaopercheseimorto@...il.com>
To: Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Sascha linux-arm <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel-infradead <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: mc13783: consider Power Gates as digital
regulators.
On mar, 2010-01-19 at 10:26 +0000, Liam Girdwood wrote:
> > +static struct regulator_ops mc13783_gpo_regulator_ops = {
> > + .enable = mc13783_gpo_regulator_enable,
> > + .disable = mc13783_gpo_regulator_disable,
> > + .is_enabled = mc13783_gpo_regulator_is_enabled,
>
> How is the voltage output on the GPO regulator governed. Is it
> controlled by a parent regulator or fixed ?
>
> We probably want a way to query the voltage here or specify the parent
> relationship.
Good question.
>>From datasheet GPO's are marked as LV (Low Voltage)-> 3.1V
Power Gates Driver are marked as EMV (Extended Medium Voltage) -> 5.5V
and no way to modify that -> they are fixed regulators.
I will add voltage query capability.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists