[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201001191609.46434.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:09:46 +0100
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
Cc: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 46/64] ide: add drive->pio_mode field
On Monday 18 January 2010 08:28:22 pm Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH] ide: add drive->pio_mode field
> >
> > Add pio_mode field to ide_drive_t matching pio_mode field used in
> > struct ata_device.
> >
> > The validity of the field is restricted to ->set_pio_mode method
> > only currently in IDE subsystem.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/ide/ide-devsets.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/ide/ide-probe.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/ide/ide-xfer-mode.c | 3 +++
> > include/linux/ide.h | 1 +
> > 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >
> > Index: b/drivers/ide/ide-devsets.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- a/drivers/ide/ide-devsets.c
> > +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-devsets.c
> > @@ -105,6 +105,8 @@ static int set_pio_mode(ide_drive_t *dri
> > return -ENOSYS;
> >
> > if (set_pio_mode_abuse(drive->hwif, arg)) {
> > + drive->pio_mode = arg + XFER_PIO_0;
> > +
> >
>
> Er, didn't understand this... these 'arg' values are not really PIO
> modes, no?
In the usual case they are and a few 'special' ->set_pio_mode implementations
will extract the desired 'arg' value just fine by doing '- XFER_PIO_0'..
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists