linux-kernel - Re: what's up with "make -j N" output?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100119165639.GC23161@linux-mips.org>
Date:	Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:56:39 +0100
From:	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
To:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: what's up with "make -j N" output?

On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:24:14PM +0200, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:

> Script does effectively:
> 
> 	make -k -j5 &>1.log

My automated builds effectively run a number of "make -j 1" builds in
parallel so I get sane parsable and readable logs.  I don't think we
give any guarantees for -j 2 or higher even though that would be highly
desirable when things go wrong.

  Ralf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/