linux-kernel - Re: [stable] [Stable-review] [0/9] 2.6.31.12-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 18 Jan 2010 20:07:46 -0800
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Nikola Ciprich <nikola.ciprich@...uxbox.cz>
Cc:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable-review@...nel.org, Ozan ??a??layan <ozan@...dus.org.tr>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, stable@...nel.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [stable] [Stable-review]  [0/9] 2.6.31.12-stable review

On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 08:49:31AM +0100, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
> > Yes, I will be maintaining the .32 kernel in a "long-term" manner.  I
> > have mentioned it before to a number of people, but don't know if I've
> > done any "official" announcement.  Things get lost in the lkml volume at
> > times.
> 
> Hi Greg,
> that's a good news! I just wonder, does this mean 2.6.27 will no longer
> be maintained? Or will You still be pushing at least security fixes for it?
> Thanks a lot for Your reply

See my "state of the stable tree" post to lkml for details.

If you have questions after that, feel free to respond to that email.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/