lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7b6bb4a51001182107n1929d36ch358687062f65d37b@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 19 Jan 2010 13:07:23 +0800
From:	Xiaotian Feng <xtfeng@...il.com>
To:	Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>,
	x86@...nel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Limit the number of processor bootup messages

Could we consider such cases that system doesn't have a large number
of processors? This commit makes my system bootup message ugly ....

CPU0: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU    Q9400  @ 2.66GHz stepping 0a
lockdep: fixing up alternatives.
Booting Node   0, Processors  #1lockdep: fixing up alternatives.
 #2lockdep: fixing up alternatives.
 #3
Brought up 4 CPUs
Total of 4 processors activated (21278.36 BogoMIPS).

So if num_present_cpus < nr_cpu_ids, the output will never print OK.....
And the output is also twisted with lockdep prints...

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Mike Travis <travis@....com> wrote:
> x86: Limit the number of processor bootup messages
>
> When there are a large number of processors in a system, there
> is an excessive amount of messages sent to the system console.
> It's estimated that with 4096 processors in a system, and the
> console baudrate set to 56K, the startup messages will take
> about 84 minutes to clear the serial port.
>
> This set of patches limits the number of repetitious messages
> which contain no additional information.  Much of this information
> is obtainable from the /proc and /sysfs.   Some of the messages
> are also sent to the kernel log buffer as KERN_DEBUG messages so
> dmesg can be used to examine more closely any details specific to
> a problem.
>
> The new cpu bootup sequence for system_state == SYSTEM_BOOTING:
>
> Booting Node   0, Processors  #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 Ok.
> Booting Node   1, Processors  #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15 Ok.
> ...
> Booting Node   3, Processors  #56 #57 #58 #59 #60 #61 #62 #63 Ok.
> Brought up 64 CPUs
>
> After the system is running, a single line boot message is displayed
> when CPU's are hotplugged on:
>
>   Booting Node %d Processor %d APIC 0x%x
>
>
> Status of the following lines:
>
>   CPU: Physical Processor ID:          printed once (for boot cpu)
>   CPU: Processor Core ID:              printed once (for boot cpu)
>   CPU: Hyper-Threading is disabled     printed once (for boot cpu)
>   CPU: Thermal monitoring enabled      printed once (for boot cpu)
>   CPU %d/0x%x -> Node %d:              removed
>   CPU %d is now offline:               only if system_state == RUNNING
>   Initializing CPU#%d:         KERN_DEBUG
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/addon_cpuid_features.c |   15 +++++----
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c                  |    2 -
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c               |    8 +++--
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c                |    2 -
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c   |    4 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c                  |   45
> +++++++++++++++++++----------
> 6 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> --- linux.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/addon_cpuid_features.c
> +++ linux/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/addon_cpuid_features.c
> @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@
>        unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx, sub_index;
>        unsigned int ht_mask_width, core_plus_mask_width;
>        unsigned int core_select_mask, core_level_siblings;
> +       static bool printed;
>
>        if (c->cpuid_level < 0xb)
>                return;
> @@ -127,12 +128,14 @@
>
>        c->x86_max_cores = (core_level_siblings / smp_num_siblings);
>
> -
> -       printk(KERN_INFO  "CPU: Physical Processor ID: %d\n",
> -              c->phys_proc_id);
> -       if (c->x86_max_cores > 1)
> -               printk(KERN_INFO  "CPU: Processor Core ID: %d\n",
> -                      c->cpu_core_id);
> +       if (!printed) {
> +               printk(KERN_INFO  "CPU: Physical Processor ID: %d\n",
> +                      c->phys_proc_id);
> +               if (c->x86_max_cores > 1)
> +                       printk(KERN_INFO  "CPU: Processor Core ID: %d\n",
> +                              c->cpu_core_id);
> +               printed = 1;
> +       }
>        return;
> #endif
> }
> --- linux.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
> +++ linux/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
> @@ -375,8 +375,6 @@
>                        node = nearby_node(apicid);
>        }
>        numa_set_node(cpu, node);
> -
> -       printk(KERN_INFO "CPU %d/0x%x -> Node %d\n", cpu, apicid, node);
> #endif
> }
>
> --- linux.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> +++ linux/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> @@ -427,6 +427,7 @@
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_HT
>        u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
>        int index_msb, core_bits;
> +       static bool printed;
>
>        if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_HT))
>                return;
> @@ -442,7 +443,7 @@
>        smp_num_siblings = (ebx & 0xff0000) >> 16;
>
>        if (smp_num_siblings == 1) {
> -               printk(KERN_INFO  "CPU: Hyper-Threading is disabled\n");
> +               printk_once(KERN_INFO "CPU0: Hyper-Threading is
> disabled\n");
>                goto out;
>        }
>
> @@ -469,11 +470,12 @@
>                                       ((1 << core_bits) - 1);
>
> out:
> -       if ((c->x86_max_cores * smp_num_siblings) > 1) {
> +       if (!printed && (c->x86_max_cores * smp_num_siblings) > 1) {
>                printk(KERN_INFO  "CPU: Physical Processor ID: %d\n",
>                       c->phys_proc_id);
>                printk(KERN_INFO  "CPU: Processor Core ID: %d\n",
>                       c->cpu_core_id);
> +               printed = 1;
>        }
> #endif
> }
> @@ -1115,7 +1117,7 @@
>        if (cpumask_test_and_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_initialized_mask))
>                panic("CPU#%d already initialized!\n", cpu);
>
> -       printk(KERN_INFO "Initializing CPU#%d\n", cpu);
> +       pr_debug("Initializing CPU#%d\n", cpu);
>
>        clear_in_cr4(X86_CR4_VME|X86_CR4_PVI|X86_CR4_TSD|X86_CR4_DE);
>
> --- linux.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
> +++ linux/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
> @@ -266,8 +266,6 @@
>        if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE || !node_online(node))
>                node = first_node(node_online_map);
>        numa_set_node(cpu, node);
> -
> -       printk(KERN_INFO "CPU %d/0x%x -> Node %d\n", cpu, apicid, node);
> #endif
> }
>
> --- linux.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c
> +++ linux/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c
> @@ -339,8 +339,8 @@
>        l = apic_read(APIC_LVTTHMR);
>        apic_write(APIC_LVTTHMR, l & ~APIC_LVT_MASKED);
>
> -       printk(KERN_INFO "CPU%d: Thermal monitoring enabled (%s)\n",
> -              cpu, tm2 ? "TM2" : "TM1");
> +       printk_once(KERN_INFO "CPU0: Thermal monitoring enabled (%s)\n",
> +                      tm2 ? "TM2" : "TM1");
>
>        /* enable thermal throttle processing */
>        atomic_set(&therm_throt_en, 1);
> --- linux.orig/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> +++ linux/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> @@ -671,6 +671,26 @@
>        complete(&c_idle->done);
> }
>
> +/* reduce the number of lines printed when booting a large cpu count system
> */
> +static void __cpuinit announce_cpu(int cpu, int apicid)
> +{
> +       static int current_node = -1;
> +       int node = cpu_to_node(cpu);
> +
> +       if (system_state == SYSTEM_BOOTING) {
> +               if (node != current_node) {
> +                       if (current_node > (-1))
> +                               pr_cont(" Ok.\n");
> +                       current_node = node;
> +                       pr_info("Booting Node %3d, Processors ", node);
> +               }
> +               pr_cont(" #%d%s", cpu, cpu == (nr_cpu_ids - 1) ? " Ok.\n" :
> "");
> +               return;
> +       } else
> +               pr_info("Booting Node %d Processor %d APIC 0x%x\n",
> +                       node, cpu, apicid);
> +}
> +
> /*
>  * NOTE - on most systems this is a PHYSICAL apic ID, but on multiquad
>  * (ie clustered apic addressing mode), this is a LOGICAL apic ID.
> @@ -736,9 +756,8 @@
>        /* start_ip had better be page-aligned! */
>        start_ip = setup_trampoline();
>
> -       /* So we see what's up   */
> -       printk(KERN_INFO "Booting processor %d APIC 0x%x ip 0x%lx\n",
> -                         cpu, apicid, start_ip);
> +       /* So we see what's up */
> +       announce_cpu(cpu, apicid);
>
>        /*
>         * This grunge runs the startup process for
> @@ -787,21 +806,17 @@
>                        udelay(100);
>                }
>
> -               if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_callin_mask)) {
> -                       /* number CPUs logically, starting from 1 (BSP is 0)
> */
> -                       pr_debug("OK.\n");
> -                       printk(KERN_INFO "CPU%d: ", cpu);
> -                       print_cpu_info(&cpu_data(cpu));
> -                       pr_debug("CPU has booted.\n");
> -               } else {
> +               if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_callin_mask))
> +                       pr_debug("CPU%d: has booted.\n", cpu);
> +               else {
>                        boot_error = 1;
>                        if (*((volatile unsigned char *)trampoline_base)
>                                        == 0xA5)
>                                /* trampoline started but...? */
> -                               printk(KERN_ERR "Stuck ??\n");
> +                               pr_err("CPU%d: Stuck ??\n", cpu);
>                        else
>                                /* trampoline code not run */
> -                               printk(KERN_ERR "Not responding.\n");
> +                               pr_err("CPU%d: Not responding.\n", cpu);
>                        if (apic->inquire_remote_apic)
>                                apic->inquire_remote_apic(apicid);
>                }
> @@ -1291,14 +1306,16 @@
>        for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
>                /* They ack this in play_dead by setting CPU_DEAD */
>                if (per_cpu(cpu_state, cpu) == CPU_DEAD) {
> -                       printk(KERN_INFO "CPU %d is now offline\n", cpu);
> +                       if (system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING)
> +                               pr_info("CPU %u is now offline\n", cpu);
> +
>                        if (1 == num_online_cpus())
>                                alternatives_smp_switch(0);
>                        return;
>                }
>                msleep(100);
>        }
> -       printk(KERN_ERR "CPU %u didn't die...\n", cpu);
> +       pr_err("CPU %u didn't die...\n", cpu);
> }
>
> void play_dead_common(void)
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ